STX Amateur Golf Tour

Form & consistency

Every round since 2015, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.

Rounds

137

career average 74.6 (+2.8 to par)

Last 5 rounds

-0.8

Running hot · -3.6 vs career

Last 10 rounds

+2.4

previous 10: +3.0

Consistency

±3.4

spread over the last 20 rounds · steadier than 93% of players

Last 20: best / worst

68 / 83

the range you are playing in

Your last 40 rounds against par (lower is better). The gold line is the 5-round average; the dashed line is your career average.

Year	Rounds	Average	To par	Best	Worst	Spread	Tour hcp
2026	11	74.2	+2.5	68	83	±4.2	1.5
2025	10	75.5	+3.8	71	83	±3.4	0.7
2024	13	72.3	+0.7	66	80	±3.6	0.7
2023	13	72.4	+0.6	69	77	±2.6	1.7
2022	13	73.7	+1.8	69	79	±3.1	1.3
2021	12	74.8	+3.2	69	80	±3.1	1.3
2020	12	72.6	+1.0	69	77	±3.0	2.3
2019	8	74.8	+3.0	68	86	±5.3	2.7
2018	12	76.2	+4.3	68	84	±4.2	3.0
2017	12	76.7	+4.9	70	85	±4.9	3.6
2016	10	77.5	+5.7	71	86	±5.7	3.7
2015	11	75.3	+3.5	70	82	±4.4	2.1

The sections below use your 103 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 1112 rounds from players whose handicap was -0.4–3.6 when they played. Negative strokes are good.

Start & finish

Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.

Stretch	You	Peers	Difference
Front nine	+1.02	+1.29	-0.27
Back nine	+1.18	+1.12	+0.07
First 3 holes	+0.38	+0.53	-0.15
Last 3 holes	+0.50	+0.44	+0.07
Whole round	+2.20	+2.41	-0.20

Your front and back nines are about even; peers gain 0.2 over the same stretch.

Scoring mix

Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.

Birdie or betterParBogeyDouble or worse

Year	Rounds	Birdies	Pars	Bogeys	Doubles+
2026	11	2.8	10.9	3.7	0.5
2025	10	2.6	9.6	4.9	0.9
2024	13	3.8	10.2	3.7	0.3
2023	13	3.5	11.1	2.7	0.7
2022	13	3.3	10.7	3.2	0.8
2021	12	3.3	9.7	3.8	1.2
2020	12	3.1	11.2	3.1	0.6
2019	8	3.2	10.0	3.2	1.5
2018	11	2.7	10.5	3.5	1.3
All time	103	3.2	10.5	3.5	0.8
Peers	1112	2.9	10.5	3.9	0.7

Courses

"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.

Course	Rounds	Average	To par	Course effect	Best	Vs peers
Brackenridge Park	29	71.1	+0.1	-2.1	66	+1.0
Riverside	12	72.2	+0.2	-2.0	68	+1.2
Northern Hills	18	74.3	+2.3	+0.1	70	+1.5
Willow Springs	14	74.8	+2.8	+0.6	70	-1.2
Mission del Lago	9	75.0	+3.0	+0.8	71	-0.1
Olmos Basin	10	75.3	+3.3	+1.1	70	-0.3
Cedar Creek	11	79.5	+7.5	+5.3	74	-1.9

Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.

Big numbers

A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.

Doubles+ per round

0.8

peers 0.7 · +0.2

Strokes lost to them

1.1

per round · peers 0.8

Share of your strokes over par

21%

peers 16%

Without the blow-ups

+1.1

average to par, vs +2.2 now

Doubles+ per round	You	Peers	Difference
On par 3s	0.17	0.13	+0.04
On par 4s	0.53	0.39	+0.15
On par 5s	0.14	0.17	-0.03

Where they happen

The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.

Hole	Plays	Blow-ups	Rate	Strokes lost	Peer rate
Cedar Creek #1 par 4	11	2	18%	6	5%
Brackenridge Park #10 par 3	29	5	17%	6	4%
Cedar Creek #15 par 4	11	2	18%	5	2%
Brackenridge Park #18 par 3	29	4	14%	5	8%
Mission del Lago #1 par 4	9	2	22%	4	10%

By year

Year	Rounds	Doubles+ per round	Strokes lost per round
2026	11	0.5	1.0
2025	10	0.9	0.9
2024	13	0.3	0.5
2023	13	0.7	0.8
2022	13	0.8	1.2
2021	12	1.2	1.5
2020	12	0.6	0.6
2019	8	1.5	1.9
2018	11	1.3	2.2

Player Insights