STX Amateur Golf Tour

Form & consistency

Every round since 2012, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.

Rounds

213

career average 74.4 (+2.6 to par)

Last 5 rounds

+0.6

Running hot · -2.0 vs career

Last 10 rounds

+1.3

previous 10: +5.1

Consistency

±3.3

spread over the last 20 rounds · steadier than 95% of players

Last 20: best / worst

69 / 82

the range you are playing in

Your last 40 rounds against par (lower is better). The gold line is the 5-round average; the dashed line is your career average.

Year	Rounds	Average	To par	Best	Worst	Spread	Tour hcp
2026	16	74.4	+2.7	69	82	±3.2	1.4
2025	15	75.1	+3.5	69	80	±2.7	1.0
2024	16	72.7	+1.1	65	78	±3.5	0.7
2023	16	74.9	+3.1	69	81	±3.6	0.9
2022	16	72.2	+0.4	67	76	±2.4	0.4
2021	15	72.4	+0.7	70	76	±2.3	0.7
2020	14	73.0	+1.4	69	80	±3.4	1.4
2019	16	73.6	+1.9	68	81	±3.9	1.8
2018	15	75.1	+3.3	69	81	±3.1	2.5
2017	14	76.0	+4.2	68	80	±3.1	2.8
2016	11	75.6	+3.8	69	85	±4.6	3.0
2015	11	75.5	+3.8	68	83	±4.4	3.0
2014	15	76.2	+4.5	69	80	±3.0	2.5
2013	13	75.2	+3.5	71	79	±2.6	2.1
2012	10	74.2	+2.6	70	77	±2.6	1.6

The sections below use your 138 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 1130 rounds from players whose handicap was -0.3–3.7 when they played. Negative strokes are good.

Start & finish

Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.

Stretch	You	Peers	Difference
Front nine	+1.00	+1.37	-0.37
Back nine	+0.99	+1.19	-0.21
First 3 holes	+0.38	+0.55	-0.16
Last 3 holes	+0.40	+0.48	-0.08
Whole round	+1.99	+2.56	-0.57

Your front and back nines are about even; peers gain 0.2 over the same stretch.

Scoring mix

Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.

Birdie or betterParBogeyDouble or worse

Year	Rounds	Birdies	Pars	Bogeys	Doubles+
2026	16	2.4	11.4	3.3	0.9
2025	15	2.1	10.8	4.6	0.5
2024	16	2.9	11.6	3.1	0.5
2023	16	2.1	11.1	4.2	0.6
2022	16	3.2	11.7	2.6	0.5
2021	15	3.0	11.6	3.1	0.3
2020	14	2.9	11.1	3.4	0.5
2019	16	3.6	9.5	4.4	0.6
2018	14	2.2	10.9	4.4	0.6
All time	138	2.7	11.1	3.7	0.5
Peers	1130	2.9	10.4	3.9	0.7

Courses

"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.

Course	Rounds	Average	To par	Course effect	Best	Vs peers
Brackenridge Park	38	71.4	+0.4	-1.6	65	+0.8
Riverside	16	72.7	+0.7	-1.3	69	+0.8
Willow Springs	16	73.1	+1.1	-0.9	67	+0.8
Olmos Basin	16	73.3	+1.3	-0.7	69	+1.9
Mission del Lago	15	75.0	+3.0	+1.0	70	+0.2
Northern Hills	23	75.4	+3.4	+1.4	70	+0.5
Cedar Creek	14	78.1	+6.1	+4.1	73	-0.3

Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.

Big numbers

A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.

Doubles+ per round

0.5

peers 0.7 · -0.2

Strokes lost to them

0.6

per round · peers 0.9

Share of your strokes over par

12%

peers 17%

Without the blow-ups

+1.4

average to par, vs +2.0 now

Doubles+ per round	You	Peers	Difference
On par 3s	0.14	0.14	+0.00
On par 4s	0.27	0.43	-0.17
On par 5s	0.12	0.17	-0.05

Where they happen

The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.

Hole	Plays	Blow-ups	Rate	Strokes lost	Peer rate
Brackenridge Park #18 par 3	38	5	13%	5	8%
Cedar Creek #18 par 4	14	3	21%	3	4%
Olmos Basin #6 par 3	16	3	19%	3	1%
Willow Springs #2 par 5	16	3	19%	3	16%
Cedar Creek #2 par 4	14	2	14%	3	17%

By year

Year	Rounds	Doubles+ per round	Strokes lost per round
2026	16	0.9	0.9
2025	15	0.5	0.5
2024	16	0.5	0.5
2023	16	0.6	0.6
2022	16	0.5	0.6
2021	15	0.3	0.3
2020	14	0.5	0.5
2019	16	0.6	0.6
2018	14	0.6	0.6

Player Insights