STX Amateur Golf Tour

Form & consistency

Every round since 2014, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.

Rounds

career average 86.7 (+14.9 to par)

Last 5 rounds

+11.8

Running hot · -3.1 vs career

Last 10 rounds

+11.7

previous 10: +12.1

Consistency

±3.9

spread over the last 20 rounds · steadier than 82% of players

Last 20: best / worst

78 / 91

the range you are playing in

Your last 40 rounds against par (lower is better). The gold line is the 5-round average; the dashed line is your career average.

Year	Rounds	Average	To par	Best	Worst	Spread	Tour hcp
2025	1	89.0	+17.0	89	89	–	10.0
2023	2	82.5	+10.5	82	83	–	9.2
2022	4	85.2	+13.2	81	89	–	9.2
2021	11	83.4	+11.6	78	91	±4.5	10.3
2020	9	82.6	+10.9	79	86	±2.8	11.1
2019	14	87.0	+15.2	77	100	±6.2	11.7
2018	14	87.2	+15.3	77	93	±4.5	11.1
2017	13	85.8	+14.0	80	90	±3.4	12.9
2016	4	90.0	+18.0	86	94	–	14.2
2015	14	90.8	+19.0	80	125	±11.0	14.3
2014	9	88.2	+16.4	79	98	±6.1	12.8

The sections below use your 54 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 2330 rounds from players whose handicap was 11.4–15.4 when they played. Negative strokes are good.

Start & finish

Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.

Stretch	You	Peers	Difference
Front nine	+6.02	+8.08	-2.06
Back nine	+7.44	+8.26	-0.81
First 3 holes	+2.31	+2.83	-0.51
Last 3 holes	+2.83	+2.77	+0.06
Whole round	+13.46	+16.33	-2.87

You play your back nine 1.4 strokes worse than your front; peers lose 0.2 over the same stretch.

Scoring mix

Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.

Birdie or betterParBogeyDouble or worse

Year	Rounds	Birdies	Pars	Bogeys	Doubles+
2025	1	1.0	6.0	5.0	6.0
2023	2	0.5	10.0	5.0	2.5
2022	4	0.5	7.2	7.5	2.8
2021	11	0.5	8.2	6.8	2.5
2020	9	0.7	8.1	7.1	2.1
2019	14	0.6	7.0	6.5	3.9
2018	13	0.7	5.7	8.5	3.2
All time	54	0.6	7.2	7.1	3.0
Peers	2330	0.7	6.0	7.2	4.1

Courses

"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.

Course	Rounds	Average	To par	Course effect	Best	Vs peers
Willow Springs	8	82.5	+10.5	-3.0	77	+3.8
Riverside	10	82.9	+10.9	-2.6	77	+4.0
Northern Hills	9	84.7	+12.7	-0.8	80	+5.2
Brackenridge Park	10	84.6	+13.6	+0.1	78	+1.7
Olmos Basin	4	87.2	+15.2	+1.8	81	+1.0
Mission del Lago	5	88.6	+16.6	+3.1	78	+0.4
Cedar Creek	8	89.5	+17.5	+4.0	82	+2.2

Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.

Big numbers

A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.

Doubles+ per round

3.0

peers 4.1 · -1.1

Strokes lost to them

3.9

per round · peers 5.7

Share of your strokes over par

28%

peers 34%

Without the blow-ups

+9.5

average to par, vs +13.5 now

Doubles+ per round	You	Peers	Difference
On par 3s	0.52	0.68	-0.17
On par 4s	1.87	2.52	-0.65
On par 5s	0.63	0.90	-0.27

Where they happen

The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.

Hole	Plays	Blow-ups	Rate	Strokes lost	Peer rate
Brackenridge Park #14 par 4	10	7	70%	10	47%
Willow Springs #2 par 5	8	5	62%	7	46%
Cedar Creek #7 par 3	8	4	50%	7	21%
Brackenridge Park #18 par 3	10	4	40%	7	24%
Northern Hills #12 par 4	9	4	44%	6	33%

By year

Year	Rounds	Doubles+ per round	Strokes lost per round
2025	1	6.0	7.0
2023	2	2.5	3.5
2022	4	2.8	3.5
2021	11	2.5	2.9
2020	9	2.1	2.3
2019	14	3.9	5.5
2018	13	3.2	4.2

Player Insights