STX Amateur Golf Tour

Form & consistency

Every round since 2012, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.

Rounds

career average 96.3 (+24.5 to par)

Last 5 rounds

+27.4

Running cold · +2.9 vs career

Last 10 rounds

+27.2

previous 10: +21.3

Consistency

±7.2

spread over the last 20 rounds · steadier than 8% of players

Last 20: best / worst

82 / 115

the range you are playing in

Your last 40 rounds against par (lower is better). The gold line is the 5-round average; the dashed line is your career average.

Year	Rounds	Average	To par	Best	Worst	Spread	Tour hcp
2025	2	102.0	+30.0	100	104	–	19.0
2024	9	96.3	+24.7	82	115	±9.5	19.8
2023	11	94.5	+22.6	89	102	±4.0	20.0
2022	11	98.9	+26.9	86	144	±15.4	18.9
2021	11	98.1	+26.5	90	107	±5.7	19.1
2020	8	97.2	+25.6	86	104	±6.3	19.4
2019	9	94.4	+22.7	85	102	±6.6	18.6
2018	5	97.2	+25.2	88	103	±6.4	21.8
2015	9	100.4	+28.7	84	125	±11.9	19.7
2014	6	92.2	+20.5	87	103	±5.5	15.2
2013	3	90.0	+18.0	88	92	–	14.2
2012	5	90.0	+18.4	86	98	±4.5	14.2

The sections below use your 65 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 508 rounds from players whose handicap was 21.0–25.0 when they played. Negative strokes are good.

Start & finish

Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.

Stretch	You	Peers	Difference
Front nine	+11.55	+13.81	-2.26
Back nine	+13.72	+13.95	-0.23
First 3 holes	+4.03	+4.98	-0.95
Last 3 holes	+4.77	+4.58	+0.19
Whole round	+25.28	+27.76	-2.48

You play your back nine 2.2 strokes worse than your front; peers lose 0.1 over the same stretch.

Scoring mix

Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.

Birdie or betterParBogeyDouble or worse

Year	Rounds	Birdies	Pars	Bogeys	Doubles+
2025	2	0.0	2.0	7.0	9.0
2024	8	0.2	2.9	7.5	7.4
2023	11	0.3	3.8	8.1	5.8
2022	11	0.4	3.1	8.0	6.5
2021	11	0.2	3.2	7.1	7.5
2020	8	0.2	3.9	6.1	7.8
2019	9	0.8	4.2	6.0	7.0
2018	5	0.6	3.4	6.4	7.6
All time	65	0.4	3.4	7.1	7.1
Peers	508	0.2	3.0	6.6	8.2

Courses

"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.

Course	Rounds	Average	To par	Course effect	Best	Vs peers
Riverside	8	92.2	+20.2	-5.0	85	+4.7
Mission del Lago	3	95.7	+23.7	-1.6	89	+5.1
Willow Springs	11	96.2	+24.2	-1.1	88	+1.4
Northern Hills	15	96.2	+24.2	-1.1	87	+5.3
Brackenridge Park	13	98.5	+27.5	+2.3	91	-1.3
Olmos Basin	12	100.1	+28.1	+2.8	89	-0.8
Cedar Creek	3	100.7	+28.7	+3.4	98	+3.1

Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.

Big numbers

A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.

Doubles+ per round

7.1

peers 8.2 · -1.2

Strokes lost to them

11.4

per round · peers 13.2

Share of your strokes over par

45%

peers 47%

Without the blow-ups

+13.8

average to par, vs +25.3 now

Doubles+ per round	You	Peers	Difference
On par 3s	1.35	1.45	-0.10
On par 4s	4.14	5.03	-0.89
On par 5s	1.57	1.75	-0.18

Where they happen

The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.

Hole	Plays	Blow-ups	Rate	Strokes lost	Peer rate
Brackenridge Park #18 par 3	13	9	69%	17	40%
Olmos Basin #13 par 4	12	7	58%	17	49%
Willow Springs #2 par 5	11	9	82%	16	75%
Olmos Basin #17 par 4	12	7	58%	16	61%
Northern Hills #13 par 4	15	8	53%	16	57%

By year

Year	Rounds	Doubles+ per round	Strokes lost per round
2025	2	9.0	14.0
2024	8	7.4	11.9
2023	11	5.8	9.0
2022	11	6.5	12.7
2021	11	7.5	12.0
2020	8	7.8	12.0
2019	9	7.0	10.4
2018	5	7.6	11.8

Player Insights