STX Amateur Golf Tour

Form & consistency

Every round since 2012, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.

Rounds

career average 82.0 (+10.2 to par)

Last 5 rounds

+10.6

Right on form · +0.4 vs career

Last 10 rounds

+11.2

previous 10: +13.2

Consistency

±4.8

spread over the last 20 rounds · steadier than 54% of players

Last 20: best / worst

76 / 93

the range you are playing in

Your last 40 rounds against par (lower is better). The gold line is the 5-round average; the dashed line is your career average.

Year	Rounds	Average	To par	Best	Worst	Spread	Tour hcp
2026	3	84.7	+12.7	81	88	–	9.6
2025	4	83.8	+12.2	76	92	–	8.0
2024	3	80.0	+8.3	78	83	–	9.2
2023	6	85.5	+13.5	79	93	±5.7	10.2
2022	4	84.8	+12.8	79	89	–	8.6
2021	6	81.8	+10.2	72	87	±5.6	7.0
2019	10	79.5	+7.7	76	86	±3.7	6.8
2018	7	81.9	+10.1	78	86	±2.7	7.6
2017	7	81.4	+9.7	76	86	±3.3	8.0
2016	5	79.4	+7.8	76	86	±3.7	8.1
2015	10	81.9	+10.1	72	90	±6.0	8.2
2014	11	84.5	+12.7	80	95	±4.1	8.1
2013	9	79.6	+7.8	74	85	±3.0	6.5
2012	4	82.2	+10.2	80	85	–	8.0

The sections below use your 42 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 2917 rounds from players whose handicap was 7.6–11.6 when they played. Negative strokes are good.

Start & finish

Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.

Stretch	You	Peers	Difference
Front nine	+5.43	+6.02	-0.59
Back nine	+5.12	+6.06	-0.94
First 3 holes	+2.10	+2.14	-0.05
Last 3 holes	+1.64	+2.10	-0.45
Whole round	+10.55	+12.08	-1.53

You play your back nine 0.3 strokes better than your front; peers hold steady over the same stretch.

Scoring mix

Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.

Birdie or betterParBogeyDouble or worse

Year	Rounds	Birdies	Pars	Bogeys	Doubles+
2026	3	1.3	7.3	6.0	3.3
2025	4	0.8	7.8	6.5	3.0
2024	3	1.3	8.7	6.7	1.3
2023	6	0.3	8.5	5.8	3.3
2022	4	0.5	7.5	7.2	2.8
2021	6	0.8	9.3	5.3	2.5
2019	10	1.1	9.6	6.2	1.1
2018	6	1.0	8.5	6.5	2.0
All time	42	0.9	8.6	6.2	2.3
Peers	2917	1.1	7.5	6.7	2.8

Courses

"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.

Course	Rounds	Average	To par	Course effect	Best	Vs peers
Riverside	4	78.2	+6.2	-4.3	72	+4.7
Willow Springs	4	80.0	+8.0	-2.5	76	+2.9
Brackenridge Park	9	79.7	+8.7	-1.9	76	+2.2
Mission del Lago	5	81.8	+9.8	-0.7	79	+2.4
Northern Hills	10	84.2	+12.2	+1.7	76	+1.5
Olmos Basin	4	85.2	+13.2	+2.7	79	-1.4
Cedar Creek	6	86.0	+14.0	+3.5	85	+1.9

Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.

Big numbers

A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.

Doubles+ per round

2.3

peers 2.8 · -0.5

Strokes lost to them

3.0

per round · peers 3.7

Share of your strokes over par

26%

peers 28%

Without the blow-ups

+7.6

average to par, vs +10.5 now

Doubles+ per round	You	Peers	Difference
On par 3s	0.50	0.49	+0.01
On par 4s	1.38	1.68	-0.30
On par 5s	0.38	0.59	-0.21

Where they happen

The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.

Hole	Plays	Blow-ups	Rate	Strokes lost	Peer rate
Cedar Creek #13 par 4	6	4	67%	5	31%
Olmos Basin #11 par 4	3	2	67%	5	19%
Northern Hills #8 par 4	10	4	40%	4	12%
Cedar Creek #3 par 4	6	2	33%	4	23%
Brackenridge Park #14 par 4	9	2	22%	4	29%

By year

Year	Rounds	Doubles+ per round	Strokes lost per round
2026	3	3.3	4.7
2025	4	3.0	3.5
2024	3	1.3	1.7
2023	6	3.3	4.7
2022	4	2.8	3.2
2021	6	2.5	3.2
2019	10	1.1	1.5
2018	6	2.0	2.8

Player Insights