STX Amateur Golf Tour

Form & consistency

Every round since 2016, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.

Rounds

129

career average 80.5 (+8.7 to par)

Last 5 rounds

+11.0

Running cold · +2.3 vs career

Last 10 rounds

+8.7

previous 10: +3.8

Consistency

±5.5

spread over the last 20 rounds · steadier than 34% of players

Last 20: best / worst

70 / 89

the range you are playing in

Your last 40 rounds against par (lower is better). The gold line is the 5-round average; the dashed line is your career average.

Year	Rounds	Average	To par	Best	Worst	Spread	Tour hcp
2026	11	80.0	+8.2	70	89	±5.7	5.3
2025	11	76.6	+5.1	70	94	±7.0	5.3
2024	13	80.8	+9.2	74	92	±5.1	5.6
2023	14	79.6	+7.7	69	90	±6.4	5.6
2022	10	80.4	+8.4	74	91	±5.9	4.3
2021	13	77.4	+5.7	74	91	±4.4	4.8
2020	14	76.8	+5.1	65	86	±4.9	6.9
2019	16	81.3	+9.6	75	92	±4.5	9.1
2018	13	84.8	+13.1	80	97	±5.4	10.6
2017	12	85.6	+13.8	74	94	±5.5	10.4
2016	2	90.0	+18.0	85	95	–	–

The sections below use your 114 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 2267 rounds from players whose handicap was 3.7–7.7 when they played. Negative strokes are good.

Start & finish

Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.

Stretch	You	Peers	Difference
Front nine	+4.03	+3.63	+0.40
Back nine	+3.98	+3.56	+0.42
First 3 holes	+1.44	+1.29	+0.15
Last 3 holes	+1.31	+1.29	+0.02
Whole round	+8.01	+7.19	+0.82

Your front and back nines are about even; peers hold steady over the same stretch.

Scoring mix

Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.

Birdie or betterParBogeyDouble or worse

Year	Rounds	Birdies	Pars	Bogeys	Doubles+
2026	11	2.1	9.1	4.5	2.3
2025	11	2.3	10.2	4.1	1.5
2024	13	1.6	9.5	4.8	2.2
2023	14	2.1	9.0	5.0	1.9
2022	10	1.6	9.3	5.0	2.1
2021	13	2.1	9.7	4.8	1.5
2020	14	2.4	9.8	4.5	1.4
2019	16	1.3	8.5	6.2	1.9
2018	12	0.8	7.4	6.9	2.8
All time	114	1.8	9.1	5.1	1.9
Peers	2267	1.8	9.2	5.4	1.6

Courses

"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.

Course	Rounds	Average	To par	Course effect	Best	Vs peers
Brackenridge Park	29	76.7	+5.7	-2.4	65	-0.0
Riverside	15	77.9	+5.9	-2.1	73	-0.1
Willow Springs	14	78.6	+6.6	-1.4	74	-0.4
Northern Hills	21	80.6	+8.6	+0.6	73	+0.0
Mission del Lago	10	81.2	+9.2	+1.2	70	-1.6
Olmos Basin	13	81.8	+9.8	+1.8	74	-2.4
Cedar Creek	12	86.1	+14.1	+6.1	75	-2.8

Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.

Big numbers

A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.

Doubles+ per round

1.9

peers 1.6 · +0.4

Strokes lost to them

2.8

per round · peers 2.0

Share of your strokes over par

28%

peers 22%

Without the blow-ups

+5.2

average to par, vs +8.0 now

Doubles+ per round	You	Peers	Difference
On par 3s	0.34	0.30	+0.04
On par 4s	1.18	0.95	+0.23
On par 5s	0.40	0.32	+0.08

Where they happen

The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.

Hole	Plays	Blow-ups	Rate	Strokes lost	Peer rate
Northern Hills #1 par 5	21	5	24%	14	11%
Brackenridge Park #16 par 4	29	8	28%	12	16%
Cedar Creek #9 par 5	12	4	33%	9	14%
Cedar Creek #18 par 4	12	5	42%	7	15%
Olmos Basin #15 par 4	13	4	31%	7	10%

By year

Year	Rounds	Doubles+ per round	Strokes lost per round
2026	11	2.3	3.5
2025	11	1.5	1.8
2024	13	2.2	3.8
2023	14	1.9	2.9
2022	10	2.1	2.9
2021	13	1.5	1.5
2020	14	1.4	1.7
2019	16	1.9	2.8
2018	12	2.8	4.2

Player Insights