Player Insights
Form & consistency
Every round since 2020, measured against par so Brackenridge (par 71) and the par-72 courses compare fairly. This section does not change with the toggle above.
| Year | Rounds | Average | To par | Best | Worst | Spread | Tour hcp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 93.7 | +21.7 | 88 | 101 | ±4.3 | 15.2 |
| 2025 | 4 | 89.0 | +17.0 | 85 | 94 | – | 11.9 |
| 2024 | 5 | 85.6 | +13.8 | 73 | 95 | ±8.3 | 11.6 |
| 2022 | 2 | 95.5 | +23.5 | 92 | 99 | – | 11.9 |
| 2021 | 1 | 85.0 | +13.0 | 85 | 85 | – | 10.4 |
| 2020 | 8 | 85.2 | +13.4 | 78 | 93 | ±4.5 | 11.7 |
The sections below use your 25 rounds with a Golf Genius scorecard since 2018. "Peers" are the 1875 rounds from players whose handicap was 13.7–17.7 when they played. Negative strokes are good.
Start & finish
Where in the round your strokes go, in strokes to par per nine or per three holes.
| Stretch | You | Peers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front nine | +8.40 | +9.19 | -0.79 |
| Back nine | +8.92 | +9.49 | -0.57 |
| First 3 holes | +3.68 | +3.16 | +0.52 |
| Last 3 holes | +2.48 | +3.16 | -0.68 |
| Whole round | +17.32 | +18.67 | -1.35 |
You play your back nine 0.5 strokes worse than your front; peers lose 0.3 over the same stretch.
Scoring mix
Holes per round by result. More red and green, less grey, is the direction you want.
| Year | Rounds | Birdies | Pars | Bogeys | Doubles+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 0.5 | 4.3 | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
| 2025 | 4 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 5.2 | |
| 2024 | 4 | 0.5 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 4.0 | |
| 2022 | 2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.5 | 5.5 | |
| 2021 | 1 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | |
| 2020 | 8 | 0.9 | 6.9 | 7.4 | 2.9 | |
| All time | 25 | 0.6 | 6.0 | 6.8 | 4.6 | |
| Peers | 1875 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 4.9 |
Courses
"Course effect" is how much better or worse you score here than on your average course (negative is a course that suits you). "Vs peers" is strokes gained per round against like-handicap players on the same holes.
| Course | Rounds | Average | To par | Course effect | Best | Vs peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mission del Lago | 3 | 87.7 | +15.7 | -1.7 | 83 | +3.9 |
| Willow Springs | 5 | 88.0 | +16.0 | -1.3 | 85 | +1.3 |
| Riverside | 5 | 88.2 | +16.2 | -1.1 | 78 | +0.7 |
| Olmos Basin | 3 | 90.7 | +18.7 | +1.3 | 84 | -0.0 |
| Cedar Creek | 5 | 92.6 | +20.6 | +3.3 | 83 | +2.2 |
Courses with fewer than 3 rounds are left out. For "Vs peers", positive means strokes gained.
Big numbers
A "blow-up" is a double bogey or worse. The strokes counted are the ones beyond a bogey on those holes, which is what a blow-up costs over simply making bogey.
| Doubles+ per round | You | Peers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On par 3s | 0.56 | 0.86 | -0.30 |
| On par 4s | 2.92 | 2.96 | -0.04 |
| On par 5s | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
Where they happen
The holes where you have made a double bogey or worse most, by strokes lost. A hole needs at least 2 blow-ups in 3 or more plays to appear.
| Hole | Plays | Blow-ups | Rate | Strokes lost | Peer rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Springs #2 par 5 | 5 | 4 | 80% | 6 | 56% |
| Cedar Creek #1 par 4 | 5 | 4 | 80% | 6 | 30% |
| Riverside #10 par 4 | 5 | 4 | 80% | 5 | 21% |
| Mission del Lago #2 par 5 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 5 | 24% |
| Mission del Lago #13 par 4 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 4 | 34% |
By year
| Year | Rounds | Doubles+ per round | Strokes lost per round |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 6.3 | 9.0 |
| 2025 | 4 | 5.2 | 6.5 |
| 2024 | 4 | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| 2022 | 2 | 5.5 | 8.5 |
| 2021 | 1 | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| 2020 | 8 | 2.9 | 4.0 |
STMPC